<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tennessee General Assembly Set to Nullify Federal Health Care Reform &#8211; Add Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lipskip.com/tennessee-general-assembly-set-to-nullify-federal-health-care-reform-add-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lipskip.com/tennessee-general-assembly-set-to-nullify-federal-health-care-reform-add-choice/</link>
	<description>Government is the Problem. Not the Solution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boston Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://lipskip.com/tennessee-general-assembly-set-to-nullify-federal-health-care-reform-add-choice/comment-page-1/#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston Revolutionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lipskip.com/?p=822#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>Don’t get me wrong; I’m all *for* freedom in healthcare, and nullification is a beautiful thing...

...but Diane Black?  The woman who’s more interested in *regulating how* the government interferes in people’s lives than she is in *making sure Government doesn’t* is sponsoring this bill?

What, is it a preclude to her introduction of Diane-Care?  That certainly would seem to fit for her.

Thanks, but given the choice, I’ll choose to give the promotion to her competition, Lou Ann.  At least we know she’s mostly self-funded, so nobody’s buying her election!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t get me wrong; I’m all *for* freedom in healthcare, and nullification is a beautiful thing&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;but Diane Black?  The woman who’s more interested in *regulating how* the government interferes in people’s lives than she is in *making sure Government doesn’t* is sponsoring this bill?</p>
<p>What, is it a preclude to her introduction of Diane-Care?  That certainly would seem to fit for her.</p>
<p>Thanks, but given the choice, I’ll choose to give the promotion to her competition, Lou Ann.  At least we know she’s mostly self-funded, so nobody’s buying her election!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
